
Anyone?
Sounds right to me.scidram wrote: ↑Sat May 10, 2025 4:56 pmIf she's reduced to 1/12 in all three dimensions, then her mass/weight will be reduced to 1/12 * 1/12 * 1/12 or 1/1728. That's 0.0579% of her original mass/weight.
For every 100 lbs. of her original weight, her shrunken weight would be 0.0579 lbs, which is less than one ounce (0.0625 lbs).
Thank you. This is exactly correct. No surprise there. Good authors learn this, great authors apply it.scidram wrote: ↑Sat May 10, 2025 4:56 pmIf she's reduced to 1/12 in all three dimensions, then her mass/weight will be reduced to 1/12 * 1/12 * 1/12 or 1/1728. That's 0.0579% of her original mass/weight.
For every 100 lbs. of her original weight, her shrunken weight would be 0.0579 lbs, which is less than one ounce (0.0625 lbs).
Exactly. I'm sympathetic to the plight of tiny women. I'm always willing to give them a ........hand.Little Sally wrote: ↑Mon May 12, 2025 9:33 pmCarrying those enormous boobs around would weigh heavily on any little woman!![]()
That's right. I think someone worked out that someone who was three inches tall would be able to jump several feet into the air. So an SW climbing up a full sized person to look them in the eye is actually realistic.Note that real world physics and physiology, smaller creatures are proportionately stronger and consequently more agile and better climber than larger creatures. Likewise, speed does not decrease in direct proportion to size. Also, smaller creatures are less vulnerable to falls than larger creatures.