Normal voice vs High-Pitched

A place to talk about shrunken women in any form
User avatar
Jeebus
Shrink Adept
Shrink Adept
Posts: 76
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2018 11:28 pm
Gender:

Re: Normal voice vs High-Pitched

Post by Jeebus » Tue Sep 16, 2025 4:44 am

DocRick wrote:
Tue Sep 16, 2025 3:28 am
Disagree. I work with dogs and I've had 100+ pound dogs bark in a high octave and 20 pound beagles bellow a deep bark. The guitar string and musical instrument concept is irrelevant to compare to vocal cords due to their physical makeup. There would be an abnormal sound to the tiny's voice as she would have to speak or yell because the relative distance from, say the floor to your ears while standing up would be like yelling across a football field. But the pitch wouldn't be greatly affected.
I had a Maine Coon cat that was higher-pitched than a Tabby half its size. Regardless, that has nothing on a human-sized vocal cavity reduced to 1/8 its size. The musical instrument analogy definitely rings true, as human vocals are just a wind instrument. I don't think your opinion is based in science

User avatar
Elana
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1072
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2018 11:04 am
Gender:

Re: Normal voice vs High-Pitched

Post by Elana » Tue Sep 16, 2025 3:14 pm

But the factor of 8 is already the size difference between normal non shrunken humans.
The idea that it works like fixed length instruments just doesn't hold true.
Protect freedom of Expression!
Stand against all censors and self proclaimed morale apostles

User avatar
ShrinkMaster
Shrink Master
Shrink Master
Posts: 254
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2018 12:35 pm
Gender:

Re: Normal voice vs High-Pitched

Post by ShrinkMaster » Tue Sep 16, 2025 11:27 pm

I am also more of a fan of physical realism when it comes to size changes. This includes keeping the voice normal. Peter Dinklage, at 4.4 ft (1.35 m), sounds normal too. ;)
I don't like playing with dolls,
I like to play with little woman!!

User avatar
DocRick
Shrink Grand Master
Shrink Grand Master
Posts: 4132
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2023 2:53 am
Location: The Dark Side
Gender:

Re: Normal voice vs High-Pitched

Post by DocRick » Wed Sep 17, 2025 1:27 am

Jeebus wrote:
Tue Sep 16, 2025 4:44 am


I had a Maine Coon cat that was higher-pitched than a Tabby half its size. Regardless, that has nothing on a human-sized vocal cavity reduced to 1/8 its size. The musical instrument analogy definitely rings true, as human vocals are just a wind instrument. I don't think your opinion is based in science
Your statements contradict themselves. But I'm no longer willing to argue "Fantasy science". If you want high pitched SW voices, so be it. The other side of the discussion will be continue with softer normal pitched SW voices.

User avatar
Prof Sai
Shrink Grand Master
Shrink Grand Master
Posts: 1854
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2018 11:27 pm
Gender:

Re: Normal voice vs High-Pitched

Post by Prof Sai » Wed Sep 17, 2025 6:15 pm

ShrinkMaster wrote:
Tue Sep 16, 2025 11:27 pm
I am also more of a fan of physical realism when it comes to size changes. This includes keeping the voice normal. Peter Dinklage, at 4.4 ft (1.35 m), sounds normal too. ;)
Peter Dinklage has a normal sized head and torso. I don't think anyone fantasizes about achondroplasia.
You can bring in realism, but ultimately this is a fantasy.

User avatar
Flippity-Floosy
Shrink Adept
Shrink Adept
Posts: 64
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2023 8:25 pm
Location: Earth: The First Frontier
Gender:

Re: Normal voice vs High-Pitched

Post by Flippity-Floosy » Sun Sep 21, 2025 8:13 pm

Not going to lie, I genuinely forgot when I posted this question, but I'm sincerely glad to see how much nuance every has on the take of pitch/volume.

That's just my little two cents.
Little lady. Big weeb. Normal-sized writer. What's on the menu?
Image